Social Security Check Cuts: New November Date Announced if Reductions Occur

Donald Trump’s campaign proposals could bring Social Security financial insolvency significantly faster than would otherwise be the case, resulting in drastic benefit cuts for millions of Americans. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) says if Trump does what he promises, his plans could add several years to the program’s insolvency—and push its solvency back by three years from 2034 to 2031, or earlier. And it would represent a massive increase in the pace at which Social Security’s funding crisis would boil over, funding benefits to retirees, the disabled, and survivors.

Trump’s Proposed Tax Cuts and Social Security Implications

Among the expansive series of tax cuts Trump has pitched are a reduction of the corporate tax rate, a repeal of taxes on overtime pay and tips and a repeal of taxes on Social Security benefits. These measures are meant to help out with cash, but the CRFB warned that cutting taxes the way they are would only make Social Security’s cash deficits worse. The proposals would swell Social Security’s projected deficit by $2.3 trillion by the end of the decade if they also reduced revenue streams that are necessary to support the program’s funding.

In addition, the planning of tariffs or fees on imported goods and mass deporting the undocumented immigrants may directly affect Social Security. If the labor force shrank because of deportations, for example, by reducing the number of workers paying into the system, the program’s financial stability would be further undermined.

Impact on Social Security’s Solvency Timeline

Trump’s policies would shorten the time line to Social Security’s solvency by one-third, moving the projected date of insolvency back one year to fiscal year 2031, according to the CRFB. Without changes to maintain funding for the program, this more rapid timeline could result in a third across the board reduction in benefits of 33% by 2035, a sharper cut than the 23 % that is on the table now.

Different amounts have been estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Social Security trustees for the date at which the program’s trust funds will be exhausted. The CBO sees insolvency in 2034; the trustees see it just a little bit later, in 2035. But the trust fund set up to pay retirement benefits could even go dry as soon as 2033. Trump’s proposals would likewise raise these timelines and boost the annual deficit gap by roughly 50% by 2035.

Challenges in Restoring Long-Term Solvency

Trump’s proposals would need either extremely large benefit cuts or extremely large revenue increases to restore Social Security’s long-term financial stability. The payouts would need to be cut by about one third, or revenue raised by about 50%, to secure the program’s solvency for 75 years. Without that political and public resistance, these measures would be hard to implement.

The Role of Immigration Policies in Social Security’s Future

Mass deportations of aspiring immigrants could worsen Social Security’s funding problems, given Trump’s immigration policies. The program survives out of funds provided by payroll taxes from working people, including immigrants. A lowered revenue base by shrinking the number of workers contributing to the system could compound the program’s already dire financial issue.

However, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has proposed policies to protect Social Security and Medicare. But her position on immigration, Trump’s campaign argues, could bring in a lot of undocumented immigrants that could stress Social Security. Importantly, these benefits are not available to most undocumented immigrants, and this argument does not fully ring true given that reality.

Expert Opinions on Social Security’s Viability Under Trump’s Plans

Social Security’s biggest beneficiaries sound divided on Trump’s policies. ‘There is a great risk from this proposed tax cut that could totally distort the revenue going into the trust fund and leave us with a system that cannot be sustained, ‘ said Maria Freese of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. With that date looming well within a decade, she warns that such measures could do tremendous damage to the program’s long-term outlook.

At the same time, however, Andrew Biggs, a former Social Security Administration deputy commissioner, says that the Trump campaign explicitly pushes not to weaken Social Security. Some policies, including the complete removal of taxes on some benefits, have a direct impact on the program, whereas immigration restrictions may have a lower immediate impact but can certainly affect long-term sustainability.

Political Promises to “Protect” Social Security

Trump and Harris both have pledged to protect Social Security and Medicare, a nod to the programs to tens of millions of people. But the specifics of the two proposals are relatively stark: Trump argues for tax cuts and for control over immigration, while Harris advocates for expanding benefits and opening those to more people. These varying approaches point to the difficulties with achieving a balance between Social Security’s financial health and policy agendas.

FAQs